Music City mishmash
Few quick thoughts from Sunday night’s Music City Bowl, beyond the fact Clemson trumped my prediction.
Don’t know how much Clemson will really gain by the victory other than the chance to feel good about the season – which, actually, is pretty substantial.
But beating Kentucky was so important in the sense that the coaches and players get to avoid eight months of scrutiny and venom that would have spewed if the Tigers had lost to another middle-of-the-pack SEC squad to close on a three-game skid.
I don’t know if Swinney will guide Clemson to the level its fans desire or deem reasonable. But I don’t think there’s any question he and staff are held to a much higher standard because some are leftovers from the Tommy Bowden era, and I think the firestorm that would have ensued if they had lost would have been unfair considering the Tigers finally won the Atlantic.
We’ve kinda known this for awhile, but the game was validation that Clemson will probably be alright at running back despite C.J. Spiller’s departure.
Jamie Harper was Ron Dayne with another gear. Was speaking with former Detroit Lions prez Matt Millen beforehand about how C.J. Spiller will fit in the NFL, and Millen brought up Andre Ellington on his own.
Don’t know if that’s a compliment or curse given Millen’s track record, but I like Millen, so I’m going with the latter.
That said, as I write in tomorrow’s 5 future questions piece, the biggest concern might be who will the QB have to throw to in order to unclog the line of scrimmage? TE Dwayne Allen is the leader in the clubhouse, but there still isn’t a receiver who has shown capable of handling even the No. 2 pass-catcher role.
Spiller got bowl MVP, and when putting the value in valuable, it’s hard to argue otherwise.
But I’m not sure anyone had a better game than senior weak-side linebacker Kavell Conner. He was a beast in run support.
And what a stellar one-armed tackle by senior DE Ricky Sapp on Kentucky QB Morgan Newton, stopping Newton a half-yard short of a first down on the fourth-and-8 scramble with 5:37 left. It’s indeed a game of inches.
My siblings were in Montana last week when it was minus-22 degrees. I’d argue it might have felt colder in blustery LP Field. Don’t know if you could tell it on TV, but it was actually snowing in the second half.
Interesting decision by Kentucky to use/waste its second timeout at the end of the third quarter in order to force Clemson to punt into the wind. But the conditions definitely impacted both teams, from Kentucky’s 14-yard punt to Richard Jackson’s 44-yard field goal attempt that was batted down by the jet stream.
Swinney joked afterward that Spiller and Sapp had consequently proven capable of excelling in cold-weather NFL climates like Green Bay or Buffalo.
Defensive coordinator Kevin Steele maintained he didn’t make any different calls against Kentucky’s “wildcat” package with receiver Randall Cobb at quarterback. But after the Wildcats chewed them up with it for more than a quarter, whatever they did to improve execution worked.
Telling stat for Clemson’s defensive struggles down the stretch — in the fourth quarter, Clemson forced its first three-and-out in 22 series, a drought dating to the USC game.
3 Comments to “Music City mishmash”
Leave a Reply

Paul,
Given the fact that you are not a Clemson Homer and you seem to shoot it straight at all times regarding your opinion of Clemson, perhaps you could answer a couple of questions for me….
Do you see trouble in the water for this football team in the next couple of years due to not getting enuff 4-5 star recruits last year and this year?
If you were a Clemson fan, would you be worried that Dabo may not be nearly as effective a recruiter as a head coach as he was as an assitant?
Do you think Dabo’s the guy to lead Clemson to ACC title contention each year?
I heard youu say once this season that you think Clemson probably peeked overall talent wise this season…what does that say about finishing 9-5? Is Dabo going to have substantially less to work w/ in the coming years?
And anybody else that wants to take a shot at these questions other than Paul, please be my guest….
Alb:
1. Don’t know if I see trouble, but I’ve thought a lot lately about what impact having two lower-rated classes back-to-back is going to have on their depth in 2-3 years.
They can withstand last year’s minimal haul if enough contributors develop from this year’s class.
But the key will be, as Clemson coaches expect, bringing in a loaded group for 2011. They feel they’re in the lead for a good number of blue-chip guys.
2. Losing Dabo off the road could indirectly be an issue; I’m not sold this staff of assistants is as strong top-to-bottom recruiting as it was under Bowden. Guess we’ll see if improved efforts in Georgia trump possible drop-offs in NC and Fla.
3. Remains to be seen. But didn’t see anything this year that would make me say no.
4. I look at it differently than a lot of folks; record doesn’t mean as much as how they got there. I think it’s a reasonable record for who they had and the opponents played. Maryland makes you scratch your head even more now than then … But again, that was months ago.